SSS.6.79 - Liberty Precision Machine Anthem-S and the Savage Model 10 PC .308
/Liberty Precision Machine Anthem-S on a Savage Model 10 .308 with 20-in Barrel
The Anthem-S is designed and manufactured by Liberty Precision Machine. It is a 30 caliber centerfire rifle silencer, intended to suppress most cartridges with projectiles appropriately sized to travel through the bore, including 300 Remington Ultra Magnum. It has a 1.74-inch diameter and is 6.47 inches long. The total length with the included direct thread adapter is 6.94 inches. The user may choose to use third-party adapters compatible with the 1.375”-24tpi system. The silencer is tubeless and all welded components are 17-4 stainless steel. The end cap of the Anthem-S has a center section removeable aperture for future distal orifice changes. The Anthem-S uses a serial-ID ring on the rear portion of the silencer, under license. The silencer weighs 14.3 ounces, and the included direct thread mount weighs 1.6 ounces, for a total system weight of 15.9 ounces, as tested. The Anthem-S can be obtained from Liberty Precision Machine.
PEW Science is an independent private testing laboratory and also the world’s only publicly funded suppressed small arms research cooperative. Testing, data analysis, and reporting is generated with funding provided by PEW Science members. Any test data that is generated with any portion of private funding contains this disclosure. The testing and data production for this Sound Signature Review was funded in part by PEW Science Project PEW-LPM-027-001-22. Therefore, data pertaining to the Anthem-S in this Sound Signature Review is published with the express written permission of Liberty Precision Machine, LLC.
This review contains single-test results using the Anthem-S with the direct thread mount on the Savage Model 10 Precision Carbine rifle, chambered in .308WIN with a 20-inch barrel. Federal XM80 149gr ammunition was used in the tests. Test results are also available for the shorter version of this silencer, the Anthem-K, in Sound Signature Review 6.80.
- Section 6.79.1 contains the Anthem-S test results and analysis.
- Section 6.79.2 contains back pressure and Suppression Rating comparisons with selected .30 rifle silencers possessing a PEW Science Back Pressure Metric, Ω [Pa-1] in Omega Zone 5 and above. An updated Ω metric chart for the full suite of publicly evaluated .30 rifle silencers is also provided in this section. Further information about the Ω metric and Omega Zones can be obtained in PEW Science Research Supplement 6.40 (Public Article).
- Section 6.79.3 contains the review summary and PEW Science opinions.
Summary: When paired with the Savage M10 20” .308 and fired with Federal XM80, the Liberty Precision Machine Anthem-S, mounted with direct thread, achieved a Suppression Rating™ of 45.3 in PEW Science testing. As with all weapon systems, the user is encouraged to examine both muzzle and ear Suppression Ratings.
Test data for the compact version of this silencer, the Liberty Precision Machine Anthem-K, can be found in Sound Signature Review 6.80.
Relative Suppression Rating Performance is Summarized in SSS.7 - PEW Science Rankings
6.79.1 Liberty Precision Machine Anthem-S Sound Signature Test Results
A summary of the principal Silencer Sound Standard performance metrics of the Anthem-S is shown in Table 1. The data acquired 1.0 m (39.4 in) left of the muzzle is available for viewing to all. This is a members-only review and includes pressure and impulse waveforms measured at the shooter’s ear. PEW Science thanks you for your support; further testing, research, and development of PEW-SOFT and the Silencer Sound Standard is made possible by members like you!
6.79.1.1 SOUND SIGNATURES AT THE MUZZLE
Real sound pressure histories acquired with PEW-SOFT™ are shown below. The waveforms are not averaged, decimated, or filtered. The data acquisition rate used in all PEW Science testing is 1.0 MS/s (1 MHz). The peaks, shape, and time phasing (when the peaks occur in relation to absolute time and to each other) of these raw waveforms are the most accurate of any firearm silencer testing publicly available. PEW-SOFT data is acquired by PEW Science independent testing; the industry leader in silencer sound research. For more information, please consult the Silencer Sound Standard.
Figure 1 shows a 2.7 millisecond long portion of the first round sound pressure signature of the Anthem-S as measured 1.0 m left of the muzzle. There are four significant waveform features labeled:
The end cap exit event results in an initial overpressure peak magnitude of 140.7 dB.
Jetting is immediately suppressed down to an amplitude of 120.7 dB
The first major jet reaches a peak amplitude of 146.1 dB, which is also the peak FRP.
Latent jetting occurs with an amplitude of 143.9 dB.
This is a somewhat typical sequence observed when firing supersonic .308WIN ammunition from a bolt-action rifle with an attached silencer that exhibits relatively high flow restriction (back pressure). Internal silencer design can significantly influence the measured timing and pressure amplitudes. Preliminary back pressure comparisons are shown in Section 6.79.3 of this review, with the PEW Science Back Pressure Metric, Ω [Pa-1].
The waveform shown in Figure 1 possesses early time characteristics very similar to the FRP signature of silencers exhibiting flow restriction (back pressure) in PEW Science Omega Zone 6, such as the Diligent Defense Enticer-S (Review 6.68), the Rugged Surge (Review 6.22), the Otter Creek Labs PR30S (Review 6.49), the CGS Helios QD (Review 6.13), the Silencer Central Banish 30 (Review 6.74) ,and the Silencer Central Banish 30 Gold (Review 6.69). As highlighted in previous PEW Science publications, the Q Thunder Chicken (Review 6.20) is also in Zone 6 and possesses similar features of early time gas delay. The bullet exit event of the Thunder Chicken possesses an atypical gas jet coupling, characteristic of the bore and baffle design in Q rifle silencers.
The Liberty Precision Machine Anthem-S is the quietest silencer in Omega Zone 6 tested by PEW Science, to date. It approaches the Suppression Rating performance of silencers in Omega Zone 7. The Anthem-S possesses a unique signature characteristic most often present in the first round signatures of silencers with higher flow restriction, which is a peak FRP amplitude occurring as the first major jet (Feature 3, Figure 1). The Anthem-S possesses a highly efficient coaxial baffle assembly with optimized expansion volumes in both the proximal and distal ends. This enables to the Anthem-S to continuously redirect high pressure gasses for efficient stagnation relief during the long durations characteristic of 7.62x51mm NATO combustion. It is important to note that the Liberty Precision Machine Anthem-S does this without immediate venting from the proximal expansion (blast) chamber. This characteristic brings forth three significant performance conclusions:
The Anthem-S uses a similar (but more advanced) suppression methodology as the Dead Air Nomad-30 (Review 6.43) in a similar size envelope, but significantly outperforms the Nomad-30 on this platform.
The Anthem-S significantly exceeds the muzzle Suppression Rating performance of the CGS Helios QD (Review 6.13) on this platform, without as complex a geometry.
The Anthem-S possesses bystander Suppression Rating performance greater than that of the Thunder Beast Ultra 9 (Review 6.24), which is nontrivial. The Anthem-S is two inches shorter than the ULTRA 9 when mounted, and 0.6 ounces lighter.
The above three conclusions indicate that the Liberty Precision Machine Anthem-S is one of the most highly optimized 30 caliber silencers, regardless of size envelope, tested by PEW Science.
The Liberty Precision Machine Anthem-K (Review 6.80) uses similar technology, in a smaller size envelope.
Closer views of the first peak of all shots (Fig 2a) and highest peak of the first shot (Fig 2b) are shown below. Figure 2a illustrates the relative consistency of the internal silencer combustion and end cap exit event between all 5 shots during the test. These waveform feature consistencies in both gross amplitude and wave shape, from shot to shot, are discernable as a result of the high sample rate and raw, unfiltered data stream from PEW-SOFT. Figure 2b shows points later in time during Shot 1 as the maximum sound pressure occurs from the primary combustion event. Note that the total timescale in Figure 2a is 0.56 milliseconds (560 microseconds) and the total timescale in Figure 2b is only 0.07 milliseconds (70 microseconds). PEW-SOFT provides a sampling point every microsecond and the individual data points are shown in Figure 2b to illustrate this.
The primary sound signature pressure histories for all 5 shots with the Anthem-S are shown in Figure 3a. The sound signatures of Shot 1 and Shot 2 are shown in Figure 3b, in early time. The real sound impulse (momentum transfer potential) histories from the same 5-shot test are shown in Figure 4a. In Figure 4b, a shorter timescale is shown comparing the impulse of Shot 1 to that of Shot 2 and Shot 3.
The Anthem-S exhibits FRP measured at the muzzle that is perceptible to bystanders, in accordance with PEW Science inner ear modeling. The FRP is highlighted in both the pressure regime (Figure 3) and impulse regime (Figure 4).
PEW Science Research Note 1: The muzzle (bystander) suppression performance of the Anthem-S is notable. Although it does possess some FRP, is is important to note that the FRP is quieter than any shot in the entire sequence fired with a silencer such as the Rugged Surge, for example. The performance of the Anthem-S is significant; it possesses bystander Suppression Rating performance greater than that of the Thunder Beast Ultra 9 (Review 6.24), which is nontrivial. The Anthem-S is two inches shorter than the ULTRA 9 when mounted, and 0.6 ounces lighter. The comparison of the muzzle suppression performance of the two silencers on this platform illustrates the impact of timing and duration components to the overall muzzle signature. Interestingly, although the ULTRA 9 blowdown time is significantly longer than that of the Anthem-S, it also possesses less primary jet decoupling (Figure 3a). An in-depth comparison of the two silencers is the subject of a future PEW Science Member Research Supplement.
PEW Science Research Note 2: The performance of the Anthem-S is very similar to that of the CGS Helios QD, with regard to impulse accumulation at the muzzle. However, the Anthem-S exhibits the advantage of more consistent flow in early time. This is most easily recognized in Figure 3b of this review and Fig 3b, SSS.6.13.1.1. The Helios QD produces a unique sound field on this weapon system, enabling the Suppression Rating at the shooter’s ear to be on-par with that of the Anthem-S. However, the more consistent gas flow of the Anthem-S drives the muzzle Suppression Rating, and thus the composite Suppression Rating, higher. The Anthem-S is computed to possess a slightly higher flow restriction (back pressure) than the Helios QD on this weapon system, in accordance with PEW Science Research Supplement 6.40 (Public Article). This is most likely due to the significant annular venting in the Helios QD.
As typically indicated, first-round sound signatures always differ from subsequent shots, as the atmosphere within the silencer changes. The FRP phenomenon cannot always be shown by viewing only the peak sound pressure. This is one of the reasons why The Silencer Sound Standard requires examining multiple sound signature metrics. Ammunition consistency can play a role in the determination of FRP, however, the close examination of measured pressure and impulse waveforms typically excludes ammunition from the possible factors influencing true FRP, due to the relative consistency of most high quality factory ammunition.
PEW Science has made a concerted effort to characterize the FRP phenomenon with true physiological human inner-ear response analyses. Additional PEW Science Member Research Supplements containing this information are released periodically.
6.79.1.2 SOUND SIGNATURES AT SHOOTER’S EAR
Real sound pressure histories from the same 5-shot test of the Anthem-S suppressor acquired with PEW-SOFT at the shooter’s ear are shown below. Again, the waveforms are not averaged, decimated, or filtered. The data acquisition rate used in all PEW Science testing is 1.0 MS/s (1 MHz).
The primary sound signature pressure histories at the ear for all 5 shots are shown in Figure 5. The primary sound signature history is shown on the left. A zoomed-in timescale is displayed on the right, in the region of peak sound pressure for Shot 1 and Shot 2. The real sound impulse (momentum transfer potential) histories at the ear from the same 5-shot test are shown in Figure 6. Again, full and short timescales are shown.
The Anthem-S is able to mask FRP at the shooter’s ear on this platform, despite the higher late-time impulse shown in Figure 6. During testing, the first round signature was the least severe at the shooter’s position, according to PEW Science inner ear modeling, which in conjunction with the perceptible FRP to bystanders, represents a favorable sound field for bolt action rifle operators. Shooters may perceive a difference in first round signature but the hearing damage risk of the first shot is postulated to be on-par with subsequent shots with the Anthem-S on this platform.
The at-ear performance of the Anthem-S on this platform is somewhat similar to that of the CGS Helios QD, Silencer Central Banish 30 Gold, Thunder Beast ULTRA 9, and Otter Creek Labs PR30L.
6.79.2 Relative Suppression Rating and Back Pressure Comparisons (.30 Rifle Silencers)
The Anthem-S suppressor is intended to offer highly efficient sound signature suppression in a manageable size, without significant regard to back pressure. PEW Science has developed an empirical relation to quantify the back pressure (flow restriction) of silencers. Figure 7 and Figure 8 show supersonic suppression and back pressure comparisons between selected 7.62mm (30 caliber) rifle silencers shown in public PEW Science Sound Signature Reviews, as of the date of this review publication. The results shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8 are calculated from real test data acquired with PEW-SOFT. Please note the following:
- The PEW Science Back Pressure Metric, Ω [Pa-1], may be generated for any silencer and suppressed weapon system using any suitable raw external overpressure signature data acquired 1.0 m left of the silencer end cap. PEW Science highly recommends data acquisition in accordance with The Silencer Sound Standard.
- Omega Zones are presented in Table 3, below, which are intended to provide guidance to weapons developers, silencer designers, and end-users, with regard to flow restriction characteristics of different silencer designs. It is very important to note that silencers possessing a relatively high Ω can still provide functional use on weapon systems. Some weapon systems are more sensitive to Ω than others.
- It is important to note that a silencer’s Omega Zone can shift when using a mounting scheme that differs from that used in the testing referenced in the published PEW Science Sound Signature Reviews. This phenomenon occurs due to some silencer mounting schemes significantly influencing flow restriction with some silencer designs.
- The theoretical lower limit of flow restriction, or so-called "zero back pressure" would be represented by the unsupressed state, Ω = 0 [Pa-1].
- PEW Science acknowledges that other dynamic events occur within a suppressed weapon system that can also influence weapon function. Therefore, PEW Science acknowledges that Ω is not the sole parameter one must consider for total supppressed weapon system operation. However, PEW Science postulates that the Ω metric influence can be significant.
- The Back Pressure Metric relations are most easily viewed on a logarithmic scale (See Figure 8).
As stated above, the PEW Science Back Pressure Metric is most easily viewed on a logarithmic scale. The metric is nonlinear; the shape of the trend in the data presented in Figure 8, below, illustrates the potential thresholds of extreme flow rate (approaching the unsuppressed state) and extreme flow restriction (approaching the trapping of the maximum amount of combustion byproducts in a system).
Omega characterizes silencer back pressure. It is important to note that back pressure is not blow back. The back pressure of a silencer is the flow restriction it introduces in a suppressed weapon system. The blow back phenomenon that can occur during the use of a suppressed weapon system is caused by the reciprocating system actuating too early relative to overpressure decay within the weapon system, resulting in exposure of excessive internal system overpressure to atmosphere. Some weapons may be tuned to function well with silencers in a high Omega Zone. Some weapons may require low-Omega silencers due to constraints in their operating system(s). Omega metric technical details can be found in PEW Science Public Research Supplement 6.40.
The Anthem-S possesses sound suppression performance on this platform, on average, that can best be described as a cross between the Thunder Beast Ultra 9 (Review 6.24) and the CGS Helios QD (Review 6.13), in that it is the size of the Helios QD but quieter, restricts gas slightly more, and is quieter than an ULTRA 9 to bystanders while almost matching its performance at the shooter’s ear. It is very important to note that although the Liberty Precision Machine Anthem-S may be compared to the Dead Air Nomad-30 (Review 6.43) by some users due its comparable size envelope and features, the Anthem-S is in a higher performance class on this weapon system.
PEW Science Research Note 3: The performance of the Anthem-S on this platform represents that of systems created in the so-called post-PEW Science era in which the Silencer Sound Standard was published prior to the initiation of the entire product development cycle. PEW Science postulates that the combination of features, technology, and performance of silencers like the Anthem-S may be considered next-generation in the current market. Supersonic rifle suppression performance demonstrated in the size envelope of the Anthem-S is nontrivial.
It is extremely important to note that peak sound pressure [dB], peak sound impulse [dB-ms], and Omega (Ω) [Pa-1], alone, do not determine the sound supression performance of a silencer. It is the combination of these and other waveform parameters that form the total sound signature and the influence on human inner ear response. The Suppression Rating computation considers all of these factors.
6.79.3 Review Summary: Liberty Precision Machine Anthem-S on a Savage Model 10 .308 with 20-in Barrel
When paired with the Savage M10 20” .308 and fired with Federal XM80, the Liberty Precision Machine Anthem-S, mounted with direct thread, achieved a Suppression Rating™ of 45.3 in PEW Science testing.
PEW Science Subjective Opinion:
The Liberty Precision Machine Anthem-S is a mid-size and lightweight 30 caliber rifle silencer that exhibits advanced sound signature reduction for its design envelope. The Anthem-S is constructed of 17-4 stainless steel, is lighter and quieter than many longer silencers on this platform, and has a user-adaptable mounting system. The characteristics of the Anthem series, in totality, are advanced.
The Anthem-S possesses a highly efficient coaxial baffle assembly with optimized expansion volumes in both the proximal and distal ends. This enables to the Anthem-S to continuously redirect high pressure gasses for efficient stagnation relief during the long durations characteristic of 7.62x51mm NATO combustion. It is important to note that the Liberty Precision Machine Anthem-S does this without immediate venting from the proximal expansion (blast) chamber; a trait that separates it from the CGS Hyperion-technology-equipped Helios QD. The Anthem-S does not possess a continuous outer annulus; in fact, the Anthem-S technology shares some similarities with that of the Dead Air Nomad baffle technology. However, the Anthem-S possesses key features that are more advanced than present in the Nomad, including a steeper baffle angle, differing expansion volumes and transitions, and advanced distal geometry. The performance differential between the silencers, on this platform, reflects this technology advancement.
Notably, the Anthem-S is very close in performance on this platform to a Thunder Beast ULTRA 9, and actually exceeds the suppression performance of the ULTRA 9 to bystanders. As the Anthem-S is two inches shorter than the ULTRA 9 when mounted, 0.6 ounces lighter, and constructed of 17-4 stainless steel instead of titanium, this is a significant performance comparison and once again highlights a technology advancement in supersonic rifle suppression technology in the current market.
The rear mount threading of the Anthem series is 1.375”-24tpi; relatively common in many modern rifle silencers. As a result of this common modular interface, a plethora of mounting systems may be used. The performance of the Anthem-S may be influenced by mounting system choice. The user’s choice of mount may balance system weight, length, durability, utility, and even back pressure of the silencer. The data presented by PEW Science in this Sound Signature Review was measured with the direct thread mount. Note that the center portion of the Anthem series endcap may be removed. This should be considered a capability for future utilization by users.
Also notable is the licensed “Serial ID Ring” on the proximal end of the silencer. The Anthem series may be completely replaced by Liberty Precision Machine, at their discretion, should the silencer become damaged, while maintaining the same serial number. This is facilitated by the swaged fixity of the ring to the silencer body. The ring serves as the primary serialized part.
In this review, the Anthem-S performance metrics depend upon suppressing a supersonic centerfire rifle cartridge; no easy task. PEW Science encourages the reader to remain vigilant with regard to all supersonic centerfire rifle suppression claims. The gas volume and combustion products created by the firing of the supersonic .308WIN cartridge are significant; the measured pressure and impulse magnitudes, and their durations, illustrate this fact.
The hearing damage potential of supersonic centerfire rifle use is significant. PEW Science encourages the reader to consider the Suppression Rating when deciding on an appropriate silencer and host weapon combination for their desired use.